3 Comments

Are you worried about substack at all with these prying all seeing eyes ? I follow Dr Wolf and have been for these past few years . There is no doubt, in my opinion, about her investigative journalistic skills re the deep dive, with evidence, from Pfizer's own data , that even most doctors have not read because they are given the papers that say ,or maybe more like the mandates , that say: safe and effective based on the company's own research. How those fraudulent foxes love the clucking unsuspecting hens .

Expand full comment

It's a good question. So far I've seen a strong commitment from Substack's team to free speech. They've allowed many people who've been banned elsewhere (such as Naomi Wolf and dissident doctors) to keep a platform here.

Expand full comment

Substack is where I get most of my information and believe I am more educated because of the detailed writing and the food for thought it has provided . I'm thinking, maybe it's a "good" thing the powers that be don't know what it is . I saw the senate video with Matt Tibitti and Michael Shellenburger whereby they were talking about the twitter files. One of the "grill people" did not know what substack was and called Tibitti a "so called journalist " although he is award winning and has been at it for 30 years. It's when people like that somehow see what we are "allowed" to read , that gives me great pause because of explosive lock step of the one world government for the good of us all. Not sure when people will ever see the pattern .

Expand full comment